Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40359409›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2025

Safety and tolerability of intravenous liposomal GM1 in patients with Parkinson disease: A single-center open-label clinical phase I trial (NEON trial).

Stefan Halbherr, Stefanie Lerch, Sebastian Bellwald, Petra Polakova, Bettina Bannert, Marie Roumet, Roch-Philippe Charles, Martin A Walter, Corrado Bernasconi, Valérie Lisa Halbherr and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04976127 (Safety Evaluation of Intravenous Talineuren), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04976127 phase1terminatednot on this map

Safety Evaluation of Intravenous Talineuren (TLN) in Parkinson's Disease-affected Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorInnoMedica Schweiz AGRan2021 to 2025Enrolled22ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsTalineuren
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sialylation in the nervous system: Functions and mechanisms.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Stefan HalbherrInnoMedica Schweiz AG, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3641-6795
Stefanie LerchInnoMedica Schweiz AG, Bern, Switzerland.
Sebastian BellwaldInstitute of Neurology, Konolfingen, Switzerland.
Petra PolakovaInnoMedica Schweiz AG, Bern, Switzerland.
Bettina BannertDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3955-7073
Marie RoumetDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6655-1428
Roch-Philippe CharlesInnoMedica Schweiz AG, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5243-3866
Martin A WalterSt. Anna Hospital, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6487-5349
Corrado BernasconiLimites Medical Research Ltd., Vacallo, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1019-5468
Valérie Lisa HalbherrInnoMedica Schweiz AG, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0992-5146
Camille PeitschInnoMedica Schweiz AG, Bern, Switzerland.
Pascal C BaumgartnerInnoMedica Schweiz AG, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6889-1861
Céline KaufmannInnoMedica Schweiz AG, Bern, Switzerland.
Vanessa AiresInnoMedica Schweiz AG, Bern, Switzerland.
Heinrich P MattleUniversity of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7968-1731
Alain Kaelin-LangFaculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5249-073X
Andreas HartmannDépartement de Neurologie, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0335-984X
Michael SchuepbachInstitute of Neurology, Konolfingen, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1382-3359

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParkinson disease (PD) is a chronic progressive neurodegenerative disorder leading to motor and non-motor impairment, often resulting in severe loss of quality of life. There are symptomatic treatments without effect on the progression of PD. A disease-modifying treatment that could ideally stop the neurodegenerative process is direly needed. Monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1) is a promising molecule with neuroprotective effects in preclinical models of PD and has yielded encouraging results in patients with PD in a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Talineuren (TLN) is a liposomal formulation of GM1 that has been shown to cross the blood-brain barrier in animals. We assessed the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of TLN in patients with PD. METHODS AND

findingsWe prospectively enrolled 12 patients with PD into a single-center, open-label phase I trial to assess the safety and tolerability of weekly infusions with TLN. The maximum suitable dose of TLN was determined by dose escalation in three patients. All three patients tolerated the predetermined maximal dose of 720 mg. Subsequently, these and nine additional patients received weekly infusions at the maximum suitable dose of 720 mg TLN over two months (1 patient stopped prematurely). PK were determined for the additional nine patients as a secondary outcome measure. Cmax was reached 4 h after infusion start for all but one participant, who reached Cmax after 1 h, while the median plasma half-life was reached at 12.6 h. All adverse events were continuously assessed as the primary objective and coded according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Clinical manifestations of PD were assessed as secondary outcomes using the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), including a levodopa challenge test at baseline and end. In addition to weekly history taking, scales to measure mood, behavior, quality of life, sleepiness, non-motor symptoms of PD, and cognition were used as further secondary outcomes as well as assessing the Levodopa-Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD). Overall, 304 adverse events (mean: 25.33; 6-75 events per patient) occurred, 267 of which were mild (mean: 22.25; 3-72 events per patient). 23 were considered related to the study treatment (0-8 events per patient). Very mild-to-severe acute infusion reactions at the second, third, or fourth administration of TLN within the first minutes of the infusion occurred in seven patients. All reported back or neck pain. Other acute infusion reactions were urticaria, plethora, nausea, and chest pain. These adverse reactions disappeared within minutes of stopping the infusion and did not recur when TLN administration was resumed at a very low rate. Beyond the fourth administration, infusions could be given at increased rates up to 370 ml/h, and no acute reaction occurred anymore. The mechanism of this acute infusion reaction remains unclear. Some patients reported mild dizziness for a few hours after TLN following many but not all administrations throughout the study. Non-motor symptoms of PD, motor parkinsonian signs off medication, and quality of life improved significantly during the treatment phase, including the MDS-UPDRS total score (mean decrease -11.09; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]; -18, -4.1; p = 0.006), the Parkinson's disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) summary index (mean decrease -2.91; 95% CI; -4.4, -1.4; p = 0.005), and the Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire (NMS-Quest) (mean decrease -4.27; 95% CI; -6.5, -2.1; p = 0.009). No statistically significant improvements were seen in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (mean decrease -0.73; 95% CI; -2.1, 0.62; p = 0.255), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (mean increase 0.09; 95% CI; -2.6, 2.8; p > 0.999), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (mean decrease -1.27; 95% CI; -3.8, 1.3; p = 0.257), and the Starkstein Apathy Scale (mean increase 0.36; 95% CI; -1.6, 2.4; p = 0.822). Dopaminergic medications remained stable during the study (LEDD mean increase 8.18; 95% CI; -7.7, 24; p = 0.423). While clinical improvements indicate a benefit associated with TLN treatment, the trial design does not allow for definite conclusions regarding efficacy. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial will be required to corroborate our exploratory findings.

conclusionTLN is safe and well-tolerated in general. This prospective phase I trial revealed non-allergic habituating acute infusion reactions at the second, third, or fourth treatment that can be prevented by a slower rate of infusion. Importantly, the exploratory results suggest a consistent improvement of signs and symptoms of PD.

trial registrationThe NEON trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov) #NCT04976127 and in the Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP000004631).

Indexed as

G(M1) GangliosideParkinson DiseaseAgedFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousLiposomesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeG(M1) GangliosideLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID40359409
PMCPMC12101738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.