Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40359296›Full record

ArticleCornea2026

Latin American Consensus on Ocular Lubricants and Dry Eye Disease (LUBOS): A Report on Severity Classification, Diagnosis, and Therapy.

Alejandro Rodriguez-Garcia, Maria Ximena Nuñez, José Alvaro Pereira-Gomes, Maria A Henriquez, Manuel Garza-Leon, Alejandro Aguilar, LUBOS Expert Panelists*

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Cornea, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Scleral lenses and PROSE: indications, complications, and future challenges.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alejandro Rodriguez-GarciaTecnologico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences; Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Monterrey, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1419-2109
Maria Ximena NuñezUnit of Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Grupo de Investigacion Vision Sana, Clinica de Oftalmologia de Cali, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-4974-5321
José Alvaro Pereira-GomesDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7329-9531
Maria A HenriquezDepartment of Research, OftalmoSalud Instituto de Ojos, Lima, Peru.ORCID 0000-0001-9392-5536
Manuel Garza-LeonDivision of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Monterrey, San Pedro Gaza García, Mexico ; and.ORCID 0000-0001-9515-1992
Alejandro AguilarUniversidad del Salvador Buenos Aires. Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-5277-2879
LUBOS Expert Panelists*

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis consensus aims to establish a practical severity classification for applying a tailored stepladder treatment algorithm helpful to any clinician.

methodsA modified Delphi methodology was used to establish a consensus on the definition, diagnosis, severity classification, and treatment algorithms for dry eye disease (DED) adapted to the needs of Latin America. The consensus focused on promoting the effective use of lubricants and providing straightforward, practical guidance for ophthalmologists treating dry eyes. Twenty-eight corneal specialists from representative Latin American countries reviewed the scientific evidence and drew on their expertise to answer specifically designed open-ended questions.

resultsA simple diagnostic algorithm (clinical history, DED questionnaire, and dry eye clinical tests) identified patients with the disease. A practical severity classification system of four grades: mild, moderate, severe, and LUBOS plus DED was based on four criteria: OSDI, film break-up time, Sjögren International Collaborative Clinical Alliance ocular surface staining score, and international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction meibomian gland functionality test. For classification, ≥2 criteria of the highest severity grade from the worse eye were considered. A stepladder therapeutic algorithm aligned with disease severity consisted of 5 steps, each with proposed and recommended treatment alternatives. Patient education, lifestyle recommendations, adverse environment avoidance, lubricants, and eyelid therapy were reinforced during the therapy period.

conclusionsThe LUBOS expert panel consensus considered the diverse geoenvironmental, socioeconomic, cultural, and ethnic factors pertinent to Latin America. This consensus offers an accessible and cost-effective tool, enabling professionals to detect, evaluate, and grade the severity of dry eye disease effectively for planning adequate therapeutic strategies that can be monitored with confidence.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesLubricant Eye DropsAlgorithmsDelphi TechniqueHumansLatin AmericaOphthalmic SolutionsSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesTearsLubricant Eye DropsOphthalmic Solutionsartificial tearsDelphi consensusdry eye diseaseLatin Americalubricant eye dropsocular surfaceOSDItear film

Identifiers

PMID40359296
PMCPMC13137972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.