ArticleCornea2026
Latin American Consensus on Ocular Lubricants and Dry Eye Disease (LUBOS): A Report on Severity Classification, Diagnosis, and Therapy.
Article in Cornea, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of Dry Eye Disease Pre- and Post-Cataract Surgery: A Personalized Approach.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Scleral lenses and PROSE: indications, complications, and future challenges.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis consensus aims to establish a practical severity classification for applying a tailored stepladder treatment algorithm helpful to any clinician.
methodsA modified Delphi methodology was used to establish a consensus on the definition, diagnosis, severity classification, and treatment algorithms for dry eye disease (DED) adapted to the needs of Latin America. The consensus focused on promoting the effective use of lubricants and providing straightforward, practical guidance for ophthalmologists treating dry eyes. Twenty-eight corneal specialists from representative Latin American countries reviewed the scientific evidence and drew on their expertise to answer specifically designed open-ended questions.
resultsA simple diagnostic algorithm (clinical history, DED questionnaire, and dry eye clinical tests) identified patients with the disease. A practical severity classification system of four grades: mild, moderate, severe, and LUBOS plus DED was based on four criteria: OSDI, film break-up time, Sjögren International Collaborative Clinical Alliance ocular surface staining score, and international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction meibomian gland functionality test. For classification, ≥2 criteria of the highest severity grade from the worse eye were considered. A stepladder therapeutic algorithm aligned with disease severity consisted of 5 steps, each with proposed and recommended treatment alternatives. Patient education, lifestyle recommendations, adverse environment avoidance, lubricants, and eyelid therapy were reinforced during the therapy period.
conclusionsThe LUBOS expert panel consensus considered the diverse geoenvironmental, socioeconomic, cultural, and ethnic factors pertinent to Latin America. This consensus offers an accessible and cost-effective tool, enabling professionals to detect, evaluate, and grade the severity of dry eye disease effectively for planning adequate therapeutic strategies that can be monitored with confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.