ArticleEuropean journal of gastroenterology & hepatology2025
Primary intrahepatic lithiasis in western countries: role of ultrasound and comparison with MRI with MRCP.
Article in European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Causal effects of cholelithiasis on hepatopancreatobiliary diseases: a multi-cohort Mendelian randomization study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo study hepatobiliary expert ultrasound (US) in a cohort of suspected primary intrahepatic lithiasis (IHL) and to compare these findings with MRI/MRCP data.
methodsAll patients with a diagnosis of primary-IHL based upon biological and, or, clinical symptoms who underwent US between 2008 and 2023 were retrospectively enrolled in two tertiary hepatobiliary centers. Clinical characteristics, available genetic and radiological features (expert US and MRCP) were recorded. Data were compared for the presence of comet-tail images or stones on US, between US and MRCP features and between imaging and patients' genetic status. Statistical analyses were performed with R software environment version 4.2.1, by univariate and multivariate analysis.
resultsA total of 112 primary-IHL patients were included (mean age 43 years old ±14 and 55% women). US identified primary-IHL in 92/112 (82%) patients including intrahepatic biliary comet-tail in 82/112 (73%) and stones in 51/112 (46%). Among these, 66/112 (68%) had both US and MRCP. Lithiasis was identified in 60/76 US (79%) and 44/76 MRCP (58%). MRCP showed only stones in 22/76, 29%. Genetic testing was performed in 66/112 (58%) patients. Thirty-two (49%) of these patients had pathogenic ABCB4/MDR3 gene variants, 14/66 (21%) other pathogenic variants and 5/66 (5%) had unknown significant variants. No genetic abnormalities were found in 19/66 (29%). A multivariate logistic model with the comet-tail sign as an outcome showed that there was a significant negative correlation between other pathogenic genetic variants and the comet-tail phenotype ( P -value = 0.049).
conclusionUS, and not MRCP, should be the primary diagnostic tool in suspected primary-IHL patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.