ArticlePloS one2025
Characterization of the murine spine for spaceflight studies.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spaceflight and the rodent skeleton: A perspective.Bone reports · 2026Review
- The effect of spaceflight on tissues of the spinal column.Bone reports · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rodents provide a useful analog for understanding the effects of spaceflight on the human body, offering opportunities for investigations into the relationship between microgravity and the musculoskeletal system. In particular, rodents have often been utilized to improve our understanding of the effects of spaceflight on the spine, including intervertebral disc and vertebral body health. However, there are a number of experimental factors that differ between existing works, including mission duration, animal housing, and anatomical location of interest, making it difficult to draw holistic conclusions. Additionally, the quadrupedal nature of the murine spine results in different biomechanical loading than in a bipedal organism. Thus, the objective of this study was to more fully define the bulk properties of the murine lumbar spine model after 28 days of spaceflight. Additionally, the proximal tibia was analyzed to provide insight into the skeletal site-specificity of gravitational unloading in space. Results indicated that the effects of spaceflight on vertebral body bone microarchitecture, intervertebral disc biochemistry, and intervertebral disc joint mechanics were statistically insignificant, while large and significant bone loss was observed in the proximal tibia of the same animals. We hypothesize that this may be due to site-specific loading changes in space. Specifically, vigorous ambulatory behaviors observed in this experiment after initial acclimation to spaceflight may increase axial load-bearing in the lumbar spine, while maintaining microgravity induced mechanical unloading in the tibia. In total, this work shows that the rodent spine, unlike the weight bearing tibia in the same mice, is not affected by gravitational unloading, suggesting the tissue degenerative effects of spaceflight are site- and load-specific and not systemic. This study also highlights the importance of considering experimental variables such as habitat acclimation, physical activity, and experiment duration as key factors in determining musculoskeletal and spine health outcomes during spaceflight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.