ArticlePloS one2025
Malicious traffic prediction model for ResNet based on Maple-IDS dataset.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In light of the increasing threat posed by cyberattacks, it is imperative for organizations to accurately identify malicious network traffic. However, the imbalance among various attack categories diminishes the accuracy of model predictions. To address this issue, we propose the Maple-IDS dataset as an innovative solution. We utilize DPDK along with its zero-copy (ZC) technology and BPF compiler to compile filtering rules. Additionally, a headless client is employed to generate control traffic, thereby preventing overfitting. Our data collections are sourced from a variety of operating systems and middleware platforms, ensuring broad applicability and relevance. By comparing our dataset with the CIC-IDS-2017 dataset, we achieve a more balanced representation of attack data, which enhances the model's learning performance. To tackle the challenges of low accuracy and slow convergence speed in existing network security situation predictions, we propose a network situation awareness prediction model that integrates a residual network with an improved attention mechanism. This model leverages the attention mechanism to assign greater weight to abnormal data, thereby facilitating the accurate identification of anomalies within large data streams. Furthermore, the residual network accelerates convergence speed, enhances the model's expressive capability, and improves the efficiency of rapid response to attacks. Experimental results indicate that the accuracy of predicting attack data flows reaches an impressive 99.83%, which significantly aids in the early detection of network security threats and enables preemptive measures to maintain normal network operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.