Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40359214›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2025

Gram-negative bacterial sepsis, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and treatment outcomes at two neonatal intensive care units in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A retrospective observational study.

Biniyam Tedla Mamo, Zelalem Tazu Bonger, Feyissa Regassa Senbato, Tadesse Eguale, Kibrewossen Kiflu Akililu, Samuel Muluye Welelaw, Eden Dagnachew Zeleke, Asrat Demtse, Turegne Assefa, Ruth Woldeyohannes Yirgu and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Risk factors for multidrug resistance and mortality in healthcare-associated neonatal gram-negative bloodstream infections.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Research Progress on perinatalFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Biniyam Tedla MamoOhio State Global One Health, LLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5586-2964
Zelalem Tazu BongerOhio State Global One Health, LLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Feyissa Regassa SenbatoOhio State Global One Health, LLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Tadesse EgualeOhio State Global One Health, LLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Kibrewossen Kiflu AkililuOhio State Global One Health, LLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Samuel Muluye WelelawOhio State Global One Health, LLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Eden Dagnachew ZelekeOhio State Global One Health, LLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Asrat DemtseDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, School of Medicine, College of health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Turegne AssefaDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, School of Medicine, College of health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ruth Woldeyohannes YirguDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Zewditu Memorial Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Zelalem MekuriaThe Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Global One Health Initiative, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Joan-Miquel Balada-LlasatThe Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Global One Health Initiative, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Shu-Hua WangThe Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Global One Health Initiative, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8006-2401

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal sepsis is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity. To improve the clinical outcomes of neonates with sepsis, treatment should be based on bacteriological identification and antibiotic susceptibility. This study aims to assess the proportion of culture-positive gram-negative bacteria (GNB), the antibiotic susceptibility patterns, and treatment outcomes of neonatal sepsis at two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Addis Ababa.

methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted among gram-negative sepsis suspected neonates admitted at Zewditu Memorial Hospital and Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital NICUs from January to December 2023. All neonates who were suspected of having sepsis were included in this study. Standard microbiological culture and biochemical tests were used to identify bacterial species and the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion assay using Mueller-Hinton agar was employed to test the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates as per Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study variables. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify the factors associated with the treatment outcomes of neonatal sepsis. A p-value < 0.05 was set for statistical significance.

resultsA total of 933 neonates were diagnosed with sepsis during the study period, of which 166 neonates were enrolled in the study for gram-negative sepsis: 84 (51%) were female and 97 (58%) had early onset sepsis. The median length of hospital stay was nine days with interquartile range of 16 days. The predominant GNB identified was Klebsiella spp. (n = 89; 49%), followed by Acinetobacter spp. (n = 38; 21%) and Escherichia coli (n = 19; 11%). In both hospitals, Klebsiella spp. was resistant to most of the routinely prescribed antibiotics: (n = 68; 89%) were resistant to ceftriaxone, (n = 56, 89%) cefepime and (n = 60; 75%) to gentamicin. Lower rates of resistance were recorded for other antibiotics such as ciprofloxacin (n = 12; 18%), ertapenem (n = 11; 16%), meropenem (n = 9; 13%), and amikacin (n = 3; 4%). A total of 92 (55%) neonates with the GNB isolated in the current study had multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms. The study found that newborns with MDR infections were five times more likely to experience poor treatment outcomes compared to those with non-resistant strains (AOR, 5.23 95% CI [2.59, 11.11]). In addition, newborns who stayed less than seven days, compared to those who spent seven or more days in the hospital was four times (AOR: 4.16, 95% CI (2.0-9.01) more likely to experience poor health outcomes.

conclusionKlebsiella spp. was the most common GNB isolated from the NICUs. More than half neonatal sepsis was caused by MDR organisms and associated with significant poor treatment outcomes. high prevalence of MDR-gram-negative bacteremia is alarming and highlights the need for the implementation of routine surveillance and infection control measures to decrease morbidity and mortality and to combat the development of antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsNeonatal SepsisSepsisDrug Resistance, BacterialEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID40359214
PMCPMC12074502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.