Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40359205›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Developing an innovation and enterprise framework for translating UK-driven global health research into commercially viable interventions: the FLIGHT study protocol.

Ezekiel Boro, Charles McLoughlin, Tom Vaughan, Carolina Velasco, Lisa Tilokani, Katherine Prescott, Gail Davey, Simon J Waddell, Alexandra Anderson, Justin Pulford and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ezekiel BoroEnterprise and Innovation Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1208-2985
Charles McLoughlinEnterprise and Innovation Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Tom VaughanResearch Strategy and Knowledge Exchange Office, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Carolina VelascoEnterprise and Innovation Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Lisa TilokaniStrategic Research Office, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Katherine PrescottDepartment of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Gail DaveyDepartment of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2796-7468
Simon J WaddellDepartment of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Alexandra AndersonStrategic Research Office, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Justin PulfordDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Chris PetersResearch Strategy and Knowledge Exchange Office, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Becky Jones-PhillipsEnterprise and Innovation Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2684-1180

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The UK Higher Education Institution (HEI) sector faces significant challenges in translating early-stage research into commercially viable public health products, particularly in infectious diseases. This gap, often termed the "valley of death," is exacerbated by a fragmented ecosystem and unclear pathways to implementation. The FLIGHT (Framework for Leveraging Innovation in Global Health Technologies) project aims to address these challenges by enhancing the commercialisation of global health research from UK HEIs to drive economic and societal impact. Led by Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, in partnership with London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, and other associated partners, FLIGHT seeks to develop a best practice Innovation and Enterprise Framework (IEF) to support R&D commercialisation. This project will use a mixed-methods approach to assess existing public health R&D assets and the commercialisation knowledge and skills of HEI professionals and Early Career Researchers (ECRs) across partner institutions. Data collection will include literature reviews, surveys, qualitative interviews, and focus group discussions exploring staff and ECR's perceptions and experiences with commercialisation, to identify barriers and opportunities for improvement. Ethical considerations and participant confidentiality are central to the study design. The FLIGHT project aims to bridge critical gaps in the innovation pipeline, fostering a robust ecosystem for translating HEI research into deployable health interventions. This initiative will contribute to strengthening the UK's global health R&D commercialisation capabilities and accelerating the development and deployment of essential public health interventions. Findings will inform policy recommendations and best practice for HEI commercialisation strategies, with implications for both UK and low-and middle-income country (LMIC) contexts.

Indexed as

Global HealthTranslational Research, BiomedicalHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID40359205
PMCPMC12074321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.