ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2025
Successful Transition to Whole-Genome Sequencing and Bioinformatics to Identify Invasive Streptococcus spp. Drug Resistance, Alaska, USA.
Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-COVID Rebound in Invasive Pneumococcal Disease Driven by Resurgence of Serotype 4 Among American Indian Individuals in the Southwest United States.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Preliminary genomic assessment of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 3 isolates in Malaysia.BMC genomic data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Arctic Investigations Program evaluated whole-genome sequencing (WGS) workflows and bioinformatics pipelines developed by the Centers' Streptococcus Laboratory. We compared WGS-based antimicrobial drug resistance predictions with phenotypic testing for group B (n = 130) and group A (n = 217) Streptococcus and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 293). Isolates were collected in Alaska during January 2019-February 2021. We also included a historical phenotypically nonsusceptible subset. Concordances between phenotypic testing and WGS predictions were 99.9% (895/896) for group B Streptococcus, 100% (1,298/1,298) for group A Streptococcus, and 99.98% (3,516/3,517) for S. pneumoniae. Common resistance determinants were ermTR, ermB, and mef for macrolides, tetM for tetracyclines, and gyrA and parC for levofloxacin. S. pneumoniae trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole nonsusceptibility was associated with folP gene insertions and folA mutations. In 2022, the Arctic Investigations Program transitioned Streptococcus spp. workflows to WGS, enabling more rapid monitoring and prevention of invasive disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.