Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40358982›Full record

ArticleJournal of synchrotron radiation2025

An injector testbed based on a direct current gun and an interchangeable very high frequency gun for superconducting continuous-wave free-electron lasers.

Xinmeng Li, Jitao Sun, Yong Yu, Jiahang Shao, Jiayue Yang, Quan Zhou, Hongli Ding, Lei Shi, Kai Tao, Chenglin Guo and 23 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of synchrotron radiation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Xinmeng LiUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0002-5955-1950
Jitao SunUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People's Republic of China.
Yong YuInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Jiahang ShaoInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Jiayue YangDalian Coherent Light Source and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, People's Republic of China.
Quan ZhouDalian Coherent Light Source and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, People's Republic of China.
Hongli DingDalian Coherent Light Source and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, People's Republic of China.
Lei ShiDalian Coherent Light Source and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, People's Republic of China.
Kai TaoDalian Coherent Light Source and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, People's Republic of China.
Chenglin GuoDalian Coherent Light Source and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, People's Republic of China.
Zhigang HeDalian Coherent Light Source and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, People's Republic of China.
Zhichao ChenDalian Coherent Light Source and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, People's Republic of China.
Zhen ChenInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Shaohua PengInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Hongfei WangInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Guoqing ZhangInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Baichao ZhangInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Zongbin LiInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Feng ZhaoInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Wei WeiInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Maomao HuangInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Wei WangInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-8446-2836
Ming LiuInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Chaofeng HeInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Liangbing HuInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0000-2236-636X
Yaqiong WangInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Han LiInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Weiming YueInstitute of Advanced Light Source Facilities, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518107, People's Republic of China.
Xilong WangDalian Coherent Light Source and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, People's Republic of China.
Guorong WuDalian Coherent Light Source and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, People's Republic of China.
Dongxu DaiDalian Coherent Light Source and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, People's Republic of China.
Weiqing ZhangDalian Coherent Light Source and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, People's Republic of China.
Xueming YangDalian Coherent Light Source and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, People's Republic of China.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2022M713081National Natural Science Foundation of China 22288201Scientific Instrument Developing Project of Chinese Academy of Science GJJSTD20190002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continuous-wave free-electron laser (CW-FEL), based on superconducting radiofrequency (SRF) technology with an electron bunch repetition rate of up to MHz levels, is one of the most advanced light sources, providing exceptionally high average and peak-brightness FEL pulses. Among the new CW-FEL facilities worldwide, the recently proposed Dalian Advanced Light Source (DALS) occupies a unique position as an extreme ultraviolet (EUV) facility primarily designed for chemical physics research. Since the beam emittance requirement for DALS is not as stringent as that for X-ray CW-FEL facilities, a direct current (DC) gun is considered as the primary electron source, with a very high frequency (VHF) gun also planned. To demonstrate key technologies and characterize the electron beam performance, a superconducting CW injector testbed, named the Electron Source Test Facility (ESTF), has been designed and is currently under construction. The testbed is uniquely designed to accommodate both guns with minimal switching effort, where the rest of the beamline layout remains unchanged except for the swapped guns. The two-gun switching scheme for the testbed is shown to be a feasible and cost-effective approach. Furthermore, the injector performance with both guns has been evaluated through a start-to-end simulation based on the DALS configuration, including the production of electron beam in the ESTF injector, the following beam acceleration and compression in a superconducting linear accelerator, and finally the beam lasing performance in the undulator section. The evaluation confirms that the DC gun is a promising electron source for CW-FEL facilities, especially for EUV applications, even though all currently constructed CW facilities have employed the VHF gun. This paper provides a comprehensive description of the injector design and the corresponding performance evaluation.

Indexed as

direct current gunelectron injectorfree-electron lasersuperconducting radiofrequencyvery high frequency gun

Identifiers

PMID40358982
PMCPMC12236255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.