ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Development of a tissue water fraction analysis method using quantitative parameter mapping for magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The myelin sheath is a multilayered structure that surrounds the axons of nerve cells. It acts as an insulator to ensure rapid and accurate transmission of electrical signals in the nervous system. Myelin water fraction (MWF) serves as a biomarker for the myelin sheath. Several methods for determining the MWF have been proposed; however, the inconsistency of MWF values is a challenge. In this study, we attempted to derive the MWF using quantitative parameter mapping (QPM). QPM ensures reproducibility by maintaining consistent imaging conditions across different scanners, enabling stable acquisition of quantitative parameters. This is expected to improve the reliability of the MWF measurements. Additionally, a significant correlation between QPM-derived parameters and the MWF has been reported. Five healthy volunteers were included in this study. QPM-MRI was performed using a 3-Tesla MR scanner with a three-dimensional radio frequency-spoiled steady-state gradient-echo (3D-RSSG) method. Using the derived quantitative values, pseudo-intensity images were generated for arbitrary continuous echo time values. Subsequently, a model equation for the brain tissue was defined. The generated signals were fitted with triexponential curve to estimate the amplitudes of each tissue component. Finally, the MWF was calculated using the amplitude ratio of each tissue. The mean MWF values for white matter and gray matter were 8.20 ± 4.97% and 7.99 ± 3.45%, respectively. This method using QPM allows for 3D data collection within a scan time applicable to standard clinical examinations and provides high accuracy in relaxation time estimation, thereby enabling stable quantification of MWF and suggesting its potential for clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40358903What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.