ArticleAdvances in therapy2025
Understanding Epidemiology of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Among Adults in Haryana: Insights from the ICMR-INDIAB Study [ICMR-INDIAB-19].
Article in Advances in therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diabetes: A comprehensive review of the Indian landscape in contrast with global trends.World journal of diabetes · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPhysical inactivity contributes to non-communicable disease (NCD) health burden, making it essential to study and address this issue at a population level. The present research aims to explore the patterns of physical activity (PA) in Haryana through a subgroup analysis of the national Indian Council of Medical Research-India Diabetes (ICMR-INDIAB) study.
methodsThis study was conducted between December 2018 and July 2019 in Haryana and included 3918 adult participants. Physical activity was assessed using the validated MDRF Physical Activity Questionnaire (MPAQ), which has domain-wise assessments of PA. Weighted prevalence was estimated using state-specific sampling weights, and associations between PA, anthropometric and biochemical profiles were assessed using bivariate analysis done using Student's unpaired t tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), or chi-square tests. Factors describing the likelihood of being active were ascertained using a multivariable nominal regression analysis.
resultsAbout 73% of the study participants were physically inactive, and only 27% were moderately to vigorously active. The time spent in different PA domains varied significantly across sociodemographic variables, including sex, education, region, occupation, and socioeconomic status. Participants from the middle socioeconomic class spent more time in work-related PA, compared to low and upper-class participants who spent more time in general and transport-related PA. There were significant statistical differences between active and non-active groups concerning their mean blood glucose levels, body mass index, waist circumference and systolic blood pressure, but the differences in the lipid profile were non-significant. However, regression analysis showed higher odds of being physically active among younger participants, men, residents in rural areas, and those having fewer years of education.
conclusionWe highlight the alarmingly high prevalence of physical inactivity across different segments of society in Haryana with significant sociodemographic disparities. Considering the increasing prevalence of NCDs, it is high time to prioritise health promotion measures and inculcate more physical activity amongst the population to achieve health-related sustainable development goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40358896What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.