ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2025
Injectable nanocomposite hydrogels for targeted intervention in cancer, wound healing, and bone and myocardial tissue engineering.
Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multifunctional hydrogel dressing for wound healing and in vitro cytotoxicity against breast cancer cells: association with GRP78 expression.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Cutting-Edge Smart Hydrogel Platforms for Improved Wound Healing.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Smart Polymer-Derived Injectable Hydrogels: Current Status and Future Perspectives.ACS polymers Au · 2025Review
- Multi-responsive nanocomposite hydrogel for synergistic photothermal-chemotherapy to prevent postoperative recurrence and metastasis of uveal melanoma.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite current medicine's fast-paced advances, many acute and chronic illnesses still lack truly effective and safe therapies. Cancer treatments often lead to off-target healthy tissue damage and poor therapeutic outcomes, wound standard treatments generally demonstrate poor healing efficacy and increased susceptibility to infection, and bone tissue engineering and myocardial tissue engineering can result in immunological rejection and limited availability. To tackle these issues, injectable hydrogels have emerged, and through the incorporation of nanoparticles, nanocomposite hydrogels have appeared as versatile platforms, offering improved biocompatibility, mechanical strength, stability, and precise controlled drug release, as well as targeted delivery with increased drug retention at the site of action, reducing systemic drug distribution to non-target sites. With the ability to deliver a diverse range of therapeutic entities, including low molecular weight drugs, proteins, antibodies, and even isolated cells, injectable nanocomposite hydrogels have revolutionized current therapies, working as multifunctional platforms capable of improving efficacy and safety in cancer treatment, including in chemotherapy, immunotherapy, photothermal therapy, magnetic hyperthermia, photodynamic therapy, chemodynamic therapy, radiotherapy, molecularly targeted therapy, and after tumor surgical removal, and in general, chronic diabetic or tumor-induced wound healing, as well as in bone tissue engineering and myocardial tissue engineering. This review provides a thorough summary and critical insight of current advances on injectable nanocomposite hydrogels as an innovative approach that could bring substantial contributions to biomedical research and clinical practice, with a focus on their applications in cancer therapy, wound healing management, and tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40358831What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.