ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
Improved commissioning of lung stereotactic body radiotherapy using a customized respiratory motion Phantom: a single- institutional study.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A novel audit methodology to improve detection of planning and delivery errors in passive motion management.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) involves delivering high doses of radiation with geometric precision in a few hypofractionated schedules. In lung SBRT, respiratory motion is an additional concern as it could cause the delivered dose distribution to deviate from the treatment plan. Therefore, it is crucial to conduct accurate commissioning tests on a dynamic phantom. In this study, the QUASAR™ Respiratory Motion Phantom was customized using 3D-printed parts to minimize motion-induced errors in measurements. The customisations included a specialized ion chamber insert designed to move with the tumour and measure the average dose at its centre. A film insert was also developed for secure fixation, enabling precise dose verification on a static plane while minimizing the risk of friction-related damage. The quality assurance (QA) tests were performed on the plans created for phantom studies indicated that ion chamber measurements were within 1.9% of the planned dose, and film gamma analysis demonstrated pass rates over 95% using the 3%/1 mm criteria. A set of SBRT volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were created for a suite of test patients using both flattened and flattening filter free (FFF) 6 MV beams and utilising robust optimization. A standardized patient-specific QA protocol was used to evaluate the treatment plans of 20 test patients, yielding film gamma pass rates above 98.8%. The suggested approach, using the 3D-printed inserts, effectively mitigated dose-blurring, providing a robust tool for lung SBRT commissioning and ensuring the reliability of lung cancer treatment with SBRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.