Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40358800›Full record

SynthesisNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2025

Predictive factors for the progression of multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis.

Yun Huang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Combined cognitive rehabilitation and neurofeedback therapy: effects on executive function and cognitive flexibility in people with multiple sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yun HuangDepartment of Neurology, The First People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin, Sichuan, 644000, China. 13541497064@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6509-0341

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis meta-analysis systematically explored predictive factors for the progression of multiple sclerosis (MS).

methodsComputerized searches were conducted in Pubmed, OVID, Web of science, Willey Library, and EMbase from inception to August 2023. Patients with MS were divided into the deterioration group, defined as those with an increase in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of ≥ 1.0 for a baseline EDSS ≤ 5.5 or ≥ 0.5 for a baseline EDSS > 5.5 during the follow-up period, and the non-deterioration group, comprising patients who exhibited no significant changes in EDSS over the same period. This study analyzed the impact of specific predictors, including age at onset, sex (male), smoking status, disease duration, number of relapses, EDSS score, prodromal neurological symptoms, and the use of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) on MS progression.

resultsOf 3647 retrieved, 14 studies were finally included. Meta-analysis showed that sex (male) [odds ratio (OR) = 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05-1.26, P < 0.01], smoking [OR = 1.92, 95%CI: 1.41-2.60, P < 0.01], relapses frequency [OR = 1.05, 95%CI: 1.02-1.08, P < 0.01], EDSS score [OR = 1.54, 95%CI: 1.10-2.15, P = 0.01], and DMTs use [OR = 0.38, 95%CI: 0.26-0.55, P < 0.01] significant influenced MS progression, while age at onset, disease duration, and prodromal neurological symptoms were not significant.

conclusionSex (male), smoking, a higher number of relapses, EDSS score, and DMTs are predictors of MS deterioration. Hence, particular attention should be given to these risk factors when assessing MS deterioration.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionMultiple SclerosisFemaleHumansMaleRisk FactorsDisease progressionMeta-analysisMultiple sclerosisPredictive factors

Identifiers

PMID40358800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.