ReviewMolecular biology reports2025
Clinical aspect of male breast cancer: a burgeoning and unaddressed issue.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A novel six-biomarker panel identified from male breast cancer-associated fibroblasts demonstrates prognostic power for prostate tumors.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Male Breast Cancer: Evaluating the Current Landscape of Diagnosis and Treatment.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rare among male cancers, male breast cancer (MBC) accounts for less than one percent of all male tumors. The prevalence of this illness and female breast cancer (FBC) have both been on the rise in recent years. While reports have implicated hormonal, environmental, and genetic variables in the development of MBC, nothing is known about its aetiology. Radiation exposure, hormonal imbalances caused by other medical conditions, and, most significantly, a positive family history of breast cancer-which indicates a hereditary predisposition-are major risk factors. While low-penetrance gene mutations (such as CHEK-2) are more prevalent, they do not enhance the risk of breast cancer development to the same extent as rare mutations in high-penetrance genes (such as BRCA1 and BRCA2). Speculated risk factors, including BRCA2 and lifestyle changes in the last few decades, are considered in light of the reasons for the rising occurrence. Topics covered include aromatase inhibitors, fulvestrant, and the prolactin and androgen receptor targeting pathways, as well as the therapeutic therapy of male breast cancer. Invasive ductal carcinomas, which account for about 90% of breast cancers in men, express many hormone receptors and show clear signs of treatment benefit. No single therapy method has been supported by published evidence from prospective randomized trials in MBC to yet. The treatment decision should be guided by the primary prognostic markers, which include tumor size and the number of axillary nodes involved. Detailed descriptions of the clinicopathologic characteristics of MBC are included in the present review. Our focus is on molecular profiling of MBC as a means to discover potential biomarkers and potential pharmacologic intervention targets. Endocrine treatment, which includes tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, and GnRH analogues, as well as cytotoxic chemotherapy, are characterized in light of the existing research. We also outline the possible function of targeted medications such as HER2-directed treatments, PARP inhibitors, and angiogenesis inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40358767What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.