ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2025
Comparing the outcome after double level osteotomies in severe valgus and varus knees.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOsteotomies have played an important role in joint preservation surgery of the knee joint for many years. A double level osteotomy is performed for severe varus or valgus deformities. There are numerous publications on double level osteotomies for severe varus deformities, whereas there are no publications on valgus deformities. The hypothesis of this study was to compare the clinical outcome after varus DLO with that after valgus DLO. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, 40 DLOs were followed up in 34 patients. In group one (13 cases, age 45.6 (16-61) years) a varization DLO was performed, in group two (24 cases, age 48.3 (20-61) years) a valgization DLO was performed. The pre- and postoperative clinical scores were recorded: Tegner Activity score, Japanese knee society Score and Lysholm Score. The leg axis and knee joint angles were recorded and compared pre- and postoperatively.
resultsThe follow-up period was 24 (6-81) months. The follow-up rate was 73% (27/37). The preoperative leg axis in group one showed an average valgus of 15.9° (9-40°). Group two had an average varus of 12° (8-21°). Postoperatively, the leg axis was 3.4° varus in group one and 0.5° valgus in group two. The mLDFA changed in group one from 83.2° to 90.9°, the MPTA from 95.5° to 87.0°. In group two, the mLDFA changed from 91.9° to 85.9° and the MPTA from 83.3° to 88.3° on average. The JLCA changed in group one from - 3.2 (- 5°-0°) to - 0.5° (- 3-2°) postoperative and in group two from 3.3° (1-8°) to 3.0° (0-6°) postoperative. Tegner score, Lysholm score and Japanese knee Society score all improved significantly in both groups. Patients with a valgus axis have worse clinical scores before surgery than the varus group, but the varus group shows a higher potential for improvement postoperatively. Every patient stated that they would have the operation performed again. Complications were rare, two overcorrections required corrective surgery. Two hinge fractures were treated intraoperatively with additional contralateral plate osteosynthesis.
conclusionsPatients show very good clinical results after DLO. The improvements in the valgus knees are greater, but starting from a lower preoperative level, probably due to improvements in both the lateral compartment and the patellofemoral compartment. An important finding was that JLCA is normalizing in valgization DLO but not in varization DLO. This needs to be considered in planning a DLO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.