ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2025
Characterization of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor as a potential candidate to improve cancer T cell therapies.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-treatment T-cell Transcriptional Signatures Predict Immunotherapy Outcomes in Melanoma.Research square · 2026Article
- Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Health and Disease.MedComm · 2025Review
- Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for breast cancer-related secondary lymphedema (Review).Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The efficacy of T-cell-based cancer therapies can be limited by the tumor microenvironment which can lead to T cell dysfunction. Multiple studies, particularly in murine models, have demonstrated the capacity of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) to negatively regulate antitumor T cell functions. AHR is a cytoplasmic receptor and transcription factor that was originally identified as a xenobiotic sensor, but has since been shown to play a significant role in the gene regulation of various immune cells, including T cells. Given the insights from murine studies, AHR emerges as a promising candidate to invalidate for optimizing T cell-based cancer therapies. However, the controversial role of AHR in human T cells underscores the need for a more comprehensive characterization of AHR expressing T cells. This study aims to investigate the regulatory mechanisms of AHR in human T cell biology to better understand its impact on reducing antitumor immune responses. Here, we knocked-out AHR in human T cells using CRISPR-Cas9 technology to characterize AHR's function in an in vitro chronic stimulation model. Engineered T cells exhibited enhanced effector- and memory-like profiles and expressed reduced amount of CD39 and TIGIT. AHR knockout enhanced human CAR-T cells' functionality and persistence upon tumor chronic stimulation. Collectively, these results highlight the role of AHR in human CAR-T cells efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.