ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025
[Bee and wasp venom allergies in children and adolescents].
Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnostic procedure to detect sensitization to bee or wasp venom should only be carried out if this results in a therapeutic consequence, i.e., allergen immunotherapy (AIT) against Hymenoptera venom (HG). The risk of a more severe reaction to another insect sting after a systemic allergic reaction is very low in children. Therefore, children who have only reacted with an intensified local reaction or generalized urticaria do not usually require AIT or an emergency kit. For children who show anaphylaxis that goes beyond urticaria, AIT and an emergency kit are indicated. The AIT for at least 3 years can significantly reduce the risk of another severe anaphylactic reaction. The chances of success of AIT are so good that in many cases the emergency kit can be dispensed with during the course of the reaction. Sting provocations for diagnostic purposes or to check the success of treatment are generally not indicated in children and adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40358721What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.