Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40358715›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2025

Older people's day centres' preventive work: views of day centre providers and their stakeholders.

Kritika Samsi, Katharine Orellana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kritika SamsiNIHR Policy Research Unit in Health & Social Care Workforce, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5961-6086
Katharine OrellanaNIHR Policy Research Unit in Health & Social Care Workforce, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1315-3706

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDay centres in England provide important social support to people living in the community. Our study aimed to further understandings of day centres' contribution to health and social care's preventive agenda.

methodsAfter obtaining ethical approval, we conducted qualitative interviews with 10-day centre stakeholders and 9 professional stakeholders, exploring their perceptions of day centres' preventive function. Participants' job roles provide context, while individual characteristics are anonymized.

resultsThematic analysis identified that day centre staff and volunteer activities to monitor attenders and intervene when needed align with the primary, secondary and tertiary prevention framework. A fourth theme, systemic opportunities, incorporates evidence, joint working and challenges.

conclusionsDay centres for older people can be well-placed to contribute to integrated care's prevailing preventive agenda. However, tight budgets and limited joint commissioning practices potentially miss the benefits of anticipatory care day centres may offer to maintaining well-being and preventing deterioration.

Indexed as

Adult Day Care CentersDay Care, MedicalPreventive Health ServicesAgedEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial SupportStakeholder ParticipationVolunteersanticipatory careday careDay centreolder peopleprevention

Identifiers

PMID40358715
PMCPMC12077476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.