Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40358703›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

Segmentation of renal vessels on non-enhanced CT images using deep learning models.

Hai Zhong, Yuan Zhao, Yumeng Zhang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hai ZhongSecond Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yuan ZhaoShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Yumeng ZhangSecond Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China. zcj810616@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the possibility of performing renal vessel reconstruction on non-enhanced CT images using deep learning models. MATERIALS AND

methods177 patients' CT scans in the non-enhanced phase, arterial phase and venous phase were chosen. These data were randomly divided into the training set (n = 120), validation set (n = 20) and test set (n = 37). In training set and validation set, a radiologist marked out the right renal arteries and veins on non-enhanced CT phase images using contrast phases as references. Trained deep learning models were tested and evaluated on the test set. A radiologist performed renal vessel reconstruction on the test set without the contrast phase reference, and the results were used for comparison. Reconstruction using the arterial phase and venous phase was used as the gold standard.

resultsWithout the contrast phase reference, both radiologist and model could accurately identify artery and vein main trunk. The accuracy was 91.9% vs. 97.3% (model vs. radiologist) in artery and 91.9% vs. 100% in vein, the difference was insignificant. The model had difficulty identify accessory arteries, the accuracy was significantly lower than radiologist (44.4% vs. 77.8%, p = 0.044). The model also had lower accuracy in accessory veins, but the difference was insignificant (64.3% vs. 85.7%, p = 0.094).

conclusionDeep learning models could accurately recognize the right renal artery and vein main trunk, and accuracy was comparable to that of radiologists. Although the current model still had difficulty recognizing small accessory vessels, further training and model optimization would solve these problems.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyDeep LearningRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRenal ArteryRenal VeinsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaCT angiogramCT venogramDeep learningNon-enhanced CTRenal vessels

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.