ArticlePediatric radiology2025
Prenatal ultrasound prediction of coarctation of the aorta: a nomogram for risk stratification.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated with Gestational Week of Diagnosis Among Pregnancies with Prenatally Recognized Congenital Heart Disease: A Tertiary Referral-Centre Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ultrasound Characteristics of an Isolated Redundant Foramen Ovale Flap in Fetuses and Its Differential Diagnosis from Aortic Coarctation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive model integrating two-dimensional ultrasound indicators and hemodynamic features for fetal coarctation of the aorta.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoarctation of the aorta is one of the most common congenital heart malformations, accounting for approximately 7% of all live births with congenital heart disease. It is crucial to make a definitive prenatal diagnosis as it can inform clinical treatment decisions.
objectiveThe diagnostic criteria for coarctation of the aorta are still controversial, and there is currently no risk nomogram available to assess the probability of coarctation of the aorta using routine ultrasound parameters. We explored the prenatal diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound parameters and established a nomogram for coarctation of the aorta. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 101 fetuses with suspected coarctation of the aorta diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound from July 2015 to June 2023 were collected retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the diagnostic results: a normal group (n=42; gestational weeks, 28.5±6.0) and a coarctation of the aorta group (n=59; gestational weeks, 26.7±5.1). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify echocardiographic predictors of coarctation of the aorta. Moreover, the patients were divided into a training set and a validation set in a ratio of 8:2, and a nomogram for the prenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta was established using R.
results(1) Aortic isthmus, aortic isthmus z-score, ascending aorta, ascending aorta z-score, pulmonary artery, pulmonary artery z-score, pulmonary artery/ascending aorta ratio, persistent left superior vena cava, and aortic arch dysplasia were the predictive markers of coarctation of the aorta in the univariate logistic regression analysis (P<0.05). (2) Aortic isthmus z-score, ascending aorta z-score, pulmonary artery/ascending aorta ratio, persistent left superior vena cava, and aortic arch dysplasia were identified as the final predictors after multivariate logistic regression analysis (P<0.05). (3) The combined model, which included aortic isthmus z-score, ascending aorta z-score, pulmonary artery/ascending aorta ratio, persistent left superior vena cava, and aortic arch dysplasia, demonstrated a larger area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (AUC=0.96, sensitivity=93.22%, specificity=88.10%) than aortic isthmus z-score alone (AUC=0.77, sensitivity=77.97%, specificity=71.43%), ascending aorta z-score alone (AUC=0.78, sensitivity=54.24%, specificity=90.48%), pulmonary artery/ascending aorta ratio alone (AUC=0.68, sensitivity=72.88%, specificity=54.76%), aortic arch dysplasia alone (AUC=0.70, sensitivity=66.10%, specificity=73.81%), and persistent left superior vena cava alone (AUC=0.72, sensitivity=79.66%, specificity=64.29%). The nomogram, which was constructed with these parameters, also exhibited excellent calibration curves and a good decision curve analysis curve.
conclusionsThe nomogram established by aortic isthmus z-score, ascending aorta z-score, pulmonary artery/ascending aorta ratio, persistent left superior vena cava, and aortic arch dysplasia demonstrated excellent efficacy in the prenatal diagnosis of coarctation of the aorta.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40358695What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.