Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40358692›Full record

ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2025

Phage Therapy for Urinary Tract Infections: Progress and Challenges Ahead.

Chase J Morgan, Haley Atkins, Alan J Wolfe, Linda Brubaker, Saima Aslam, Catherine Putonti, Michael B Doud, Lindsey A Burnett

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chase J Morgan *School of Biological Sciences, Division of Molecular Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Haley Atkins *Bioinformatics Program, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alan J WolfeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA.
Linda BrubakerDivision of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UC San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Dr, Mail Code 7433, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Saima AslamCenter for Innovative Phage Applications and Therapeutics, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Catherine PutontiBioinformatics Program, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael B DoudDivision of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, Mail Code 0116, La Jolla, CA, USA. mdoud@health.ucsd.edu.
Lindsey A BurnettDivision of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UC San Diego, 9300 Campus Point Dr, Mail Code 7433, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. liburnett@health.ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6430-4498

Funding

REPRODUCTIVE SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMK12HD000849 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Danny J Schust · 1988 to 2026
$33.2M
Investigating the mechanism of infection and therapeutic potential of Pseudomonas nucleus-forming phagesF30AI176696 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Chase Morgan · 2024 to 2026
$128k
International Urogynecological Association Basic Science GrantNIAID NIH HHS F30 AI176696NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD000849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisUrinary tract infection (UTI) treatment is a growing public health concern owing to increasing antimicrobial resistance. Phage therapy, an alternative or adjunctive treatment to antibiotics, has the potential to address this challenge. However, clinical use of phage therapy is hindered by knowledge gaps and inconsistent reporting. The objective was to review the current state of phage therapy for UTIs and highlight research priorities that can optimize phage clinical efficacy.

methodsCurrent literature on UTI phage therapy was examined, focusing on the lack of standardized phage susceptibility testing, phage characterization, and microbiological assessments during and after treatment.

resultsCritical areas requiring further investigation include appropriate phage dosing, optimal routes of administration, and the dynamics of phage-host and phage-patient interactions. The influence of the urinary microbiome, including endogenous phages, on treatment outcomes also needs to be better understood. Suggested data collection and reporting standards should be developed and implemented to improve clinical impact of studies examining phage therapy for UTI. Randomized clinical trials are needed to establish efficacy and determine the best practices for clinical use.

conclusionPhage therapy is a promising alternative to antibiotics for managing UTIs, especially in the face of rising antimicrobial resistance. To fully realize its potential, however, future research must focus on standardized protocols, dosing strategies, and the role of the urinary microbiome, with an emphasis on rigorously conducted clinical trials. These steps are essential for integrating phage therapy into mainstream UTI treatment regimens.

Indexed as

Phage TherapyUrinary Tract InfectionsBacteriophagesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobiotaUrinary TractPhage therapyUrinary phageUrinary tract infectionUrinary virome

Identifiers

PMID40358692
PMCPMC12356746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.