Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40358650›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025

Ocular adverse events of perioperative adjuvant docetaxel vs paclitaxel for breast cancer: propensity-score overlap-weighted analysis.

Chikako Iwai, Atsushi Miyawaki, Takaaki Konishi, Akira Okada, Asahi Fujita, Taisuke Jo, Hideo Yasunaga

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chikako IwaiDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. chika888i@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8260-4200
Atsushi MiyawakiDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Takaaki KonishiDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Akira OkadaDepartment of Prevention of Diabetes and Lifestyle-Related Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Asahi FujitaDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Taisuke JoDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Hideo YasunagaDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.

Funding

the Ministry of Health, labour and Welfare 23AA2003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTaxanes are known to be associated with several ocular adverse events; however, large-scale data comparing the risk of ocular adverse events between the two commonly used taxanes, docetaxel (DTX) and paclitaxel (PTX), remain limited. Therefore, we aimed to compare the risks of epiphora, cystoid macular edema, and optic neuropathy between DTX- and PTX-based chemotherapy regimens.

methodsUsing a nationwide claims database in Japan, we identified 6038 patients who initiated neoadjuvant or adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy for breast cancer between April 2014 and November 2022. Data analysis was conducted in 2024. This study was conducted across multiple referral centers and community hospitals in Japan, providing a comprehensive view of taxane-based chemotherapy practices in diverse healthcare settings. Participants included 6038 patients diagnosed with breast cancer who initiated neoadjuvant or adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy. Eligibility criteria included female patients aged 18 years or older. Participants were selected from a nationwide claims database using a consecutive sampling method. Patients who received DTX-based chemotherapy (DTX group) were compared with those who received PTX-based chemotherapy (PTX group). After adjusting for potential confounders using a propensity score-overlap weighting method, we estimated the incidence of the three ocular adverse events and hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

resultsAmong the 6038 eligible patients, 3829 were in the DTX group and 2209 in the PTX group. The adjusted HR for epiphora in the DTX group was 1.69 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17 to 2.45] compared with the PTX group. For cystoid macular edema and optic neuropathy, the adjusted HRs were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.52 to 1.04) and 0.72 (0.47 to 1.11), respectively. The composite incidence of epiphora, cystoid macular edema, and optic neuropathy did not differ significantly between the DTX and PTX groups.

conclusionAmong patients receiving taxane-based chemotherapy for breast cancer, DTX was associated with a higher risk of epiphora compared with PTX. However, the incidence rates of cystoid macular edema and optic neuropathy did not differ significantly between the two groups. These findings offer valuable insights into the ocular adverse event profile of taxane-based chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsDocetaxelEye DiseasesPaclitaxelAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansIncidenceJapanMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPropensity ScoreDocetaxelPaclitaxelBreast cancerCystoid macular edemaEpiphoraOptic neuropathyTaxane

Identifiers

PMID40358650
PMCPMC12086119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.