Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40358586›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2025

Visual search efficiency is modulated by symmetry type and texture regularity.

Rachel Moreau, Nihan Alp, Alasdair D F Clarke, Erez Freud, Peter J Kohler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rachel MoreauDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nihan AlpDepartment of Psychology, Sabancı University, Tuzla, Istanbul, Turkey.
Alasdair D F ClarkeDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
Erez FreudDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter J KohlerDepartment of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than a century of vision research has identified symmetry as a fundamental cue, which aids the visual system in making inferences about objects and surfaces in natural scenes. Most studies have focused on one type of symmetry, reflection, presented at a single image location. However, the visual system responds strongly to other types of symmetries and to symmetries that are repeated across the image plane to form textures. Here we use a visual search paradigm with arrays of repeating unit cells that contained either reflection or rotation symmetries but were otherwise matched. Participants were asked to report the presence of a target tile without symmetry. When unit cells tile the plane without gaps, they form regular textures. We manipulated texture regularity by introducing jittered gaps between unit cells. This paradigm lets us investigate the effect of symmetry type and texture regularity on visual search efficiency. Based on previous findings suggesting an advantage for reflection in visual processing, we hypothesized that search would be more efficient for reflection than rotation. We further hypothesized that regular textures would be processed more efficiently. We found independent effects of symmetry type and regularity on search efficiency that confirmed both hypotheses: Visual search was more efficient for textures with reflection symmetry and more efficient for regular textures. This provides additional support for the perceptual advantage of reflection in the context of visual search and provides important new evidence in favor of visual mechanisms specialized for processing symmetries in regular textures.

Identifiers

PMID40358586
PMCPMC12110545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.