Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Sagun ParakhTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3891-2489
Nhi HuynhTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0325-7330
Diana Dong CaoTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0006-1578-5738
Angela RigopoulosTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0006-0811-7731
Benjamin GloriaTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-6101-525X
Ingrid J G BurvenichTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8384-2403
Carmel MuroneTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-9178-9867
Christian W WichmannTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5341-8804
Nancy Yanan GuoTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-5002-6233
Clare SenkoTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5232-4491
Adam ParslowTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9868-6914
Laura AllanTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-4052-286X
Laura D OsellameTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6174-3797
Peter W JanesTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9039-1097
Fiona E ScottTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-3190-6518
Zhanqi LiuTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4312-1358
Hui K GanTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7319-8546
Andrew M ScottTumour Targeting Laboratory, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6656-295X
Funding
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) 1177837Victorian Cancer Agency (VCA) ECRF20010
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
We generated a novel HER2 mAb104, which binds to an epitope in domain II of HER2 that is conformationally exposed in tumors in response to HER2 amplification or activation but is not accessible to antibody binding in normal tissues. Consistent with other studies that evaluated antibodies targeting conformationally exposed epitopes, mAb104 lacked in vitro activity but showed potent antitumor activity in vivo. The antitumor effect in vivo was similar in magnitude to trastuzumab and pertuzumab, and combination with trastuzumab was superior to trastuzumab alone. IHC screening of normal and tumor tissues with mAb104 showed that mAb104 did not bind to normal tissues, confirming the tumor specificity of mAb104. In vivo biodistribution and imaging data demonstrated specific tumor targeting of mAb104 in HER2-expressing tumors. Confocal microscopy clearly demonstrated the internalization of mAb104 into the tumor cells, consistent with mAb104:HER2 trafficking. mAb104 is tumor-specific, exhibits potent antitumor activity in HER2-positive models, and internalizes into HER2-positive tumor cells. These results demonstrate the potential of mAb104 as a novel HER2-targeting therapy, both as a naked antibody for signaling abrogation therapy and for payload delivery as an antibody-drug conjugate or for β/α particle therapy.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Characterization of mAb104, a mAb Targeting a Conformationally Exposed, Tumor-Specific Epitope of HER2. · full record | OpenQuestion