ArticleEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2025
Psychometric assessment of the translated and culturally adapted Chinese (Cantonese) of the brief memory and executive test in people with stroke.
Article in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07425756 (Effect of Combining Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation With Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Function in People With Stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Combining Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation With Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Upper Limb Motor Function in People With Stroke: A Single- Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStroke is a leading cause of death and disability, with up to half of people with stroke developing persistent cognitive deficits. The brief memory and executive test (BMET) was developed to provide a comprehensive cognitive assessment, with a focus on executive function and processing speed. However, the psychometric properties of the BMET have not yet been studied in people with stroke.
aimThis study aimed to: 1) translate and culturally adapt the BMET into Chinese (Cantonese) (C-BMET); 2) compare the C-BMET scores of people with stroke with those of healthy old adults; 3) examine the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, minimal detectable change (MDC), and standard error of measurement (SEM) of the C-BMET in people with stroke; 4) investigate correlations between C-BMET scores and other cognitive and functional outcomes; and 5) determine the C-BMET cut-off score of C-BMET to differentiate the cognitive functions in people with stroke from that of healthy old adults.
designCross-sectional.
settingResearch lab in the Hong Kong Polytechnic University. POPULATION: People with stroke over 12 months.
methodsSixty people with stroke and 27 healthy old adults underwent C-BMET and other cognitive and functional outcomes. To examine the test-retest reliability of the C-BMET, it was re-administered to the stroke group after 7 days.
resultsPeople with stroke had significantly lower C-BMET subtotal and total scores compared to healthy old adults. The internal consistency, as indicated by Cronbach's α of 0.652, and the test-retest reliability, reflected by an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.604, were observed, with an MDC of 4.13 and a SEM of 1.49. The C-BMET scores were significantly correlated with other cognitive outcomes but not with functional outcomes. The optimal cut-off score of C-BMET to differentiate the cognitive functions in people with stroke from that of the and healthy old adults was 12.5 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.728).
conclusionsThe C-BMET scores were significantly lower in people with stroke compared with healthy old adults. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of C-BMET scores were investigated. The C-BMET scores were significantly correlated with cognitive outcomes. The optimal C-BMET cut-off score of 12.5 was identified. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The C-BMET may be considered for assessing the cognitive function, especially executive function and processing speed, of people with stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.