ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Advances in multi-trait genomic prediction approaches: classification, comparative analysis, and perspectives.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Image-based high-throughput phenotyping enables genetic analyses of pod morphological traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of genomic prediction approaches for multiple time-resolved traits in maize.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Beyond QTL and GWAS: how deep learning, graph models, and multi-omics are reshaping plant genomic prediction analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Classification-based genomic prediction for early identification of high-yielding and stable soybean genotypes.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Elucidating Genotypic Variation in Quinoa via Multidimensional Agronomic, Physiological, and Biochemical Assessments.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prediction of harvest-related traits in barley using high-throughput phenotyping data and machine learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traits in any organism are not independent, but show considerable integration, observed in a form of couplings and trade-offs. Therefore, improvement in one trait may affect other traits, often in undesired direction. To account for this problem, crop breeding increasingly relies on multi-trait genomic prediction (MT-GP) approaches that leverage the availability of genetic markers from different populations along with advances in high-throughput precision phenotyping. While significant progress has been made to jointly model multiple traits using a variety of statistical and machine learning approaches, there is no systematic comparison of advantages and shortcomings of the existing classes of MT-GP models. Here, we fill this knowledge gap by first classifying the existing MT-GP models and briefly summarizing their general principles, modeling assumptions, and potential limitations. We then perform an extensive comparative analysis with 10 traits measured in an Oryza sativa diversity panel using cross-validation scenarios relevant in breeding practice. Finally, we discuss directions that can enable the building of next generation MT-GP models in addressing pressing challenges in crop breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.