Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40358415›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2026

Implementation of geriatric clinical decision support in the emergency department for potentially inappropriate medications.

Gina A Elder, Kevin King, Marc Willner, Matthew J Campbell, Baruch S Fertel, Saket Saxena, Stephen Meldon

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of Potentially Inappropriate Medications Prescribed to Older Adults Upon Emergency Department Discharge.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Implementation of geriatric clinical decision support in the emergency department for potentially inappropriate medications.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gina A ElderDepartment of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Kevin KingDepartment of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Marc WillnerDepartment of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Matthew J CampbellDepartment of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7698-477X
Baruch S FertelNewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Saket SaxenaEmergency Services Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Stephen MeldonEmergency Services Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older adults in the emergency department (ED) is associated with increased risk of readmissions and adverse drug reactions. We sought to assess the impact of electronic health record (EHR)-based geriatric clinical decision support (CDS) on adherence to geriatric recommendations for targeted PIMs prescribed to older adults while in the ED and at ED discharge.

methodsWe performed a multicenter pre-post implementation cohort study comparing adherence to geriatric recommendations before and after implementation of ED geriatric CDS for patients 65 years or older for a targeted list of 12 PIMs. ED geriatric CDS consisted of custom order panels with clinical guidance for preferred alternative agents or preferred geriatric dosing if providers opted to proceed with ordering a targeted PIM; CDS was implemented for both medications ordered during the ED visit as well as outpatient prescriptions ordered at discharge. The primary outcomes were the proportions of ED orders and discharge prescriptions adherent to ED geriatric CDS recommendations.

resultsA total of 6745 ED orders and 1440 discharge prescriptions were eligible for study inclusion. The proportion of targeted PIMs consistent with geriatric CDS recommendations was higher in the postimplementation group compared to preimplementation group for both ED orders (52% vs. 71%; difference 19%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8%-21.3%) and discharge prescriptions (0.5% vs. 31.7%; difference 31.1%, 95% CI 27.5%-34.7%). In the postimplementation period, geriatric CDS order panel utilization for targeted PIMs was 62.1% for ED orders and 36.7% for discharge prescriptions. Among orders placed through ED geriatric CDS order panels, 90% of ED orders and 80.4% of discharge prescriptions were adherent to geriatric CDS recommendations.

conclusionsEHR-based CDS for older adults in the ED increased the proportion of ED orders and discharge prescriptions adherent to geriatric drug therapy recommendations.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalEmergency Service, HospitalInappropriate PrescribingPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleGeriatricsHumansMalePatient Discharge

Identifiers

PMID40358415
PMCPMC12834088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.