Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40358369›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2025

Optimizing Lymphedema Management After Breast Cancer: Predictive Risk Models in Clinical Practice.

Enrique Cano-Lallave, Elisa Frutos-Bernal, María Anciones-Polo, Esther Serrano-Sánchez, Ian Rodríguez-Guerrero, Paula Cuenda-Gamboa, Luis Muñoz-Bellvis, Marta Eguía-Larrea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Enrique Cano-LallaveRehabilitation Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Elisa Frutos-BernalDepartment of Statistics, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7108-481X
María Anciones-PoloDepartment of Statistics, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Esther Serrano-SánchezRehabilitation Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Ian Rodríguez-GuerreroRehabilitation Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Paula Cuenda-GamboaRehabilitation Service, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Luis Muñoz-BellvisDepartment of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Breast Unit, University Hospital of Salamanca, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Marta Eguía-LarreaDepartment of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Breast Unit, University Hospital of Salamanca, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesLymphedema secondary to multimodal breast cancer treatment is a relatively common complication that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Despite identifying several associated risk factors, accurately assessing individual risk remains challenging. This study aims to develop predictive tools integrating patient characteristics, tumor attributes, and treatment modalities to optimize clinical surveillance, enhance prevention, and enable earlier diagnosis.

methodsData were analyzed from 309 patients referred to the Lymphedema Unit of Rehabilitation Service who underwent lymphadenectomy for breast cancer between January 2016 and December 2021. Collected variables included patient demographics, tumor clinicopathological features, and treatment details. A lymphedema incidence study was conducted, complemented by univariate and multivariate regression analyses to identify risk factors. A nomogram was developed to predict high-risk patients, facilitating personalized prevention and management strategies.

resultsThe cumulative incidence of lymphedema was 18.4%. Independent risk factors included high body mass index, sedentary lifestyle, number of positive nodes (N stage), and radiotherapy, particularly targeting the breast, axilla, and supra-infraclavicular regions. The logistic regression model demonstrated an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.75, with acceptable calibration, validating the predictive model.

conclusionsThe predictive tools developed provide healthcare professionals with a means to identify patients at elevated risk of lymphedema, supporting individualized prevention and management.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymphedemaLymph Node ExcisionPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedNomogramsQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorsbreast cancerlymphadenectomylymphedemapredictive toolsrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40358369
PMCPMC12232080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.