Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40358366›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of rheumatic diseases2025

Real-World Insights From Türkiye: Biologic DMARDs Usage in Spondyloarthritis Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.

Dilara Bulut Gökten, Mehmet Engin Tezcan, Burcu Yağız, Abdulsamet Erden, Gezmiş Kimyon, Nazife Şule Yaşar Bilge, Levent Kılıç, Belkıs Nihan Coşkun, Emine Duygu Ersözlü, Orhan Küçükşahin and 14 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of rheumatic diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Dilara Bulut GöktenDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Tekirdag, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9226-7532
Mehmet Engin TezcanDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1753-4936
Burcu YağızDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye.
Abdulsamet ErdenDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Gezmiş KimyonDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Türkiye.
Nazife Şule Yaşar BilgeDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-1072
Levent KılıçDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Belkıs Nihan CoşkunDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye.
Emine Duygu ErsözlüDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Adana City Research and Training Hospital, Adana, Türkiye.
Orhan KüçükşahinDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Süleyman Serdar KocaDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Firat University, Elazig, Türkiye.
Emel GönüllüDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Türkiye.
Muhammet ÇınarDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Servet AkarDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Hakan EmmungilDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Trakya University, Edirne, Türkiye.
Timuçin KaşifoğluDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.
Cemal BesDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul Basaksehir Cam and Sakura Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Aşkın AteşDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Yavuz PehlivanDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye.
Sedat KirazDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ali İhsan ErtenliDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Hüseyin Ediz DalkılıçDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bursa Uludag University, Bursa, Türkiye.
Umut KalyoncuDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Rıdvan MercanDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tekirdag Namik Kemal University, Tekirdag, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe objective was to evaluate biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and their side effects that hindered the continuation of treatment in a patient population diagnosed with spondyloarthritis (SpA) with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤ 60 mL/min, and to compare these side effects between patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and those without.

methodsThis multicenter, observational cohort study utilized data from the TReasure database, which records SpA patients in a web-based system across Türkiye. A total of 6052 patients being included. SpA patients were categorized into two main groups: non-CKD patients and CKD patients. The clinical characteristics, disease activity, treatment options, drug retention rates, reasons for drug discontinuation, and types of adverse effects were compared between the groups.

resultsBiologics prescription pattern varied between CKD and non-CKD patients. Etanercept was prescribed more frequently (53.1%) in CKD patients. Regarding the number of side effects and drug discontinuations in CKD patients, no statistically significant differences were found between the non-CKD and CKD groups for any of the bDMARDs (adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, and certolizumab). No statistically significant differences were observed in the duration of drug retention based on CKD status for bDMARDs.

conclusionThis study offers preliminary evidence supporting the effective and safe use of bDMARDs in patients with SpA and CKD.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsKidneyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Renal Insufficiency, ChronicSpondylarthritisAdultDatabases, FactualFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsBiological Productsadverse eventbiologic DMARDschronic kidney diseasesafe usespondylarthritis

Identifiers

PMID40358366
PMCPMC12071336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.