ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2025
Forward masking in the inferior colliculus: Dynamics of discharge-rate recovery after narrowband noise maskers.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noise-invariant representations of sound emerge along the canonical cortical hierarchy.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Modeling auditory enhancement: Efferent control of cochlear gain can explain level dependence and effects of hearing loss.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In forward masking, the detection threshold for a target sound (probe) is elevated due to the presence of a preceding sound (masker). Although many factors are known to influence the probe response following a masker, the current work focused on the temporal separation (delay) between the masker and probe and the inter-trial interval (ITI). Human probe thresholds recover from forward masking within 150-300 ms, similar to neural threshold recovery in the inferior colliculus (IC) within 300 ms after tone maskers. Our study focused on the recovery of discharge rate of IC neurons in response to probe tones after narrowband Gaussian noise (GN) forward maskers, with varying time delays. Additionally, we examined how prior masker trials influenced IC rates by varying ITI. Previous masker trials affected probe-evoked discharge rates, with full recovery requiring ITIs over 1.5 s after 70 dB SPL narrowband GN maskers. Neural thresholds in the IC for probes preceded by noise maskers were in the range observed in psychoacoustical studies. Two proposed mechanisms for forward masking, persistence, and efferent gain control, were tested using rate analyses or computational modeling. A physiological model with efferent feedback gain control had responses consistent with trends in the physiological recordings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.