Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40358199›Full record

ReviewCells2025

Targeting Glioma Stem Cells: Therapeutic Opportunities and Challenges.

Asma Mahdi, Mohamed Aittaleb, Fadel Tissir

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Asma MahdiCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU), Education City, Doha P.O. Box 5825, Qatar.
Mohamed AittalebCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU), Education City, Doha P.O. Box 5825, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-4477-947X
Fadel TissirCollege of Health and Life Sciences, Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU), Education City, Doha P.O. Box 5825, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-9292-6622

Funding

Hamad Bin Khalifa University HBKU-INT-VPR-TG-02-10Qatar National Research Fund NPRP14S-0404-210140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM), or grade 4 glioma, is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults with a median survival of 15 months. Increasing evidence suggests that GBM's aggressiveness, invasiveness, and therapy resistance are driven by glioma stem cells (GSCs), a subpopulation of tumor cells that share molecular and functional characteristics with neural stem cells (NSCs). GSCs are heterogeneous and highly plastic. They evade conventional treatments by shifting their state and entering in quiescence, where they become metabolically inactive and resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. GSCs can exit quiescence and be reactivated to divide into highly proliferative tumor cells which contributes to recurrence. Understanding the molecular mechanisms regulating the biology of GSCs, their plasticity, and the switch between quiescence and mitotic activity is essential to shape new therapeutic strategies. This review examines the latest evidence on GSC biology, their role in glioblastoma progression and recurrence, emerging therapeutic approaches aimed at disrupting their proliferation and survival, and the mechanisms underlying their resistance to therapy.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaGliomaNeoplastic Stem CellsAnimalsCell ProliferationHumansNeural Stem Cellsglioma stem cellsplasticityquiescencetherapeutic targetstherapy resistance

Identifiers

PMID40358199
PMCPMC12072158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.