ArticleCells2025
Survival and Axonal Regeneration of Retinal Ganglion Cells in a Mouse Optic Nerve Crush Model After a Cell-Based Intravitreal Co-Administration of Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor and Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor at Different Post-Lesion Time Points.
Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extrinsic Regulation of Optic Nerve Axon Regeneration in the Adult Central Nervous System.Cells · 2026Review
- Article
- The Role of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in Neural Development and Cognitive Behavior in Pigeons: Advances and Future Perspectives.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Research Advances in Glanimal Models of Glaucoma: Exploring Multidimensional Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Strategies.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Article
- Current State of the Neurotrophin-Based Pharmaceutics in the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Neuroinflammation.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Allogeneic whole-eye transplantation: advancements, challenges, and future directions in vision restoration.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We recently showed, in a mouse optic nerve crush model, that a sustained cell-based intravitreal administration of ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) synergistically slowed the lesion-induced degeneration of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), resulting in the presence of approximately 35% viable RGCs eight months after the lesion. However, the combinatorial neuroprotective treatment was initiated shortly after the lesion. To mimic a more clinically relevant situation, we co-administered both factors either three or five days after an intraorbital nerve crush when approximately 35% or 57% of the RGCs were degenerated, respectively. Analyses of the retinas at different time points after the lesion consistently revealed the presence of significantly more surviving RGCs in retinas co-treated with CNTF and GDNF than in retinas treated with either factor alone. For example, when the neurotrophic factors were administered five days after the nerve crush and the animals were analyzed two months after the lesion, retinas co-treated with CNTF and GDNF contained approximately 40% of the RGCs present at the start of treatment. In comparison, monotherapy with either CNTF or GDNF protected only about 15% or 10% of the RGCs present at baseline, respectively. The number of regenerating axons in the distal nerve stumps was similar in CNTF- and CNTF/GDNF-treated animals, despite the significantly higher number of rescued RGCs in the latter group. These findings have potential implications for studies aimed at developing neuroprotective treatments for optic neuropathies such as glaucoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.