ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2025
Use of Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging to Measure Breast Volume in the Upright Position With Acceptable Accuracy.
Article in European journal of breast health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Ratio of the Resected Specimen Volume to Breast Volume, as Measured by Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging, Is Associated With Aesthetic Outcome After Breast-Conserving Surgery.European journal of breast health · 2026Article
- Suitability of 3D scanning as a screening tool for reduction mammoplasty referrals for plastic surgery-a pilot study.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Estimating Mastectomy Weight From Standard Breast Measurements, BMI, and Sister Bra Size: A Simple Clinical Formula.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The utility of three-dimensional surface imaging (3DSI) for measuring breast volume in the upright position has not been established. Materials and Methods: First, the accuracy of 3DSI measurements was evaluated using plastic models with known breast volumes. Then, the breast volumes of 30 patients were measured using 3DSI in the upright position, computed tomography (CT) in the supine position, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the prone position, and mammography (MMG) of the compressed breast. To determine the impact of 3DSI measurements, the correlation coefficients between 3DSI and CT, between MMG and CT, and between MRI and CT were calculated. Results: The accuracy of 3DSI measurements was confirmed using plastic models. The correlation coefficients between 3DSI and CT, between MRI and CT, and between MMG and CT were 0.83, 0.997, and 0.84, respectively. Although the breast volume measured by 3DSI was closely associated with that measured by CT, this correlation was weaker than that between the MRI- and CT-measured volumes and comparable with that between the MMG- and CT-measured volumes. Conclusion: 3DSI can be used to measure breast volume in the upright position with clinically acceptable accuracy for the evaluation of cosmetic surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.