Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40358139›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025

Effect of Cumulative Exposure on the Efficacy of Paroxetine: A Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic and Machine Learning Analyses.

Keiichi Shigetome, Tomoko Egashira, Tetsu Tomita, Nagisa Higa, Kazuma Iwashita, Kazuya Morita, Miki Nishimura, Tetsuya Kaneko, Hitoshi Maeda, Kazunori D Yamada and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Keiichi ShigetomeDivision of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Tomoko EgashiraDivision of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Tetsu TomitaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3184-5340
Nagisa HigaDivision of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kazuma IwashitaDivision of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kazuya MoritaDivision of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Miki NishimuraDivision of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Tetsuya KanekoDivision of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hitoshi MaedaDepartment of Biopharmaceutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kazunori D YamadaUnprecedented-Scale Data Analytics Center, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Ayami Kajiwara-MoritaDivision of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9309-2458
Kentaro OnikiDivision of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5926-7151
Norio Yasui-FurukoriDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4414-3770
Junji SaruwatariDivision of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6266-1347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely used in depression treatment. However, the relationship between treatment efficacy and plasma concentrations remains unclear. We assessed whether the anti-depressive response can be predicted based on the pharmacokinetic (PK) data of paroxetine, a frequently used SSRI. During treatment, we measured the plasma paroxetine concentrations in 179 paroxetine-treated patients with major depressive disorder. Of these patients, 50 patients had received a pre-treatment personality assessment using the Temperament and Character Inventory at baseline, and their depression severity was assessed using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at baseline and 1, 2, 4, and 6 weeks after treatment initiation. We conducted population PK modeling followed by a population PK-pharmacodynamic (popPK/PD) model to analyze the enhancement in depression severity until 6 weeks of paroxetine treatment using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Additionally, we developed machine learning models to predict the likelihood of remission after 6 weeks. The contribution of each feature to the prediction was explained using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. The area under the plasma paroxetine concentration-time curve during the first week (AUC

Indexed as

Machine LearningMajor Depressive DisorderParoxetineSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAdultAgedArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalTreatment OutcomeParoxetineSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitorsarea under the curvedepressionexposure responsemathematical modelingpharmacokinetics‐pharmacodynamicsprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID40358139
PMCPMC12167921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.