ArticleHealth care management review
Leadership dynamics in health care crises: The impact of initiating structure and consideration behaviors on safety climate in public hospitals.
Article in Health care management review. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth care crises underscore the critical need to maintain a robust safety climate to prevent medical errors and improve patient outcomes. Leadership behaviors, particularly initiating structure and consideration, are vital in shaping safety climate. However, inconsistent findings have raised questions regarding the effectiveness of these behaviors in crisis contexts. PURPOSE: This study examines how the initiating structure and consideration behaviors of clinical leaders influence safety climate during crises and explores the moderating role of leaders' affectivity in these relationships. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: Empirical data were collected from 108 dyads of clinical leaders and their direct reports across 21 public hospitals in Thailand at three intervals over one year. The study employed growth modeling using random coefficient models to analyze the impact of leadership behaviors on safety climate, accounting for the nonindependence of observations over time and variations in leader affectivity.
findingsThe results show that the positive impact of consideration behaviors on safety climate diminishes during crises, whereas initiating structure plays a crucial role in enhancing safety climate by providing clarity and stability. Additionally, leaders' positive affectivity enhances the impact of consideration behaviors on safety climate, although this effect weakens as the crisis intensifies. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These findings highlight the need for clinical leaders to balance initiating structure with consideration to enhance safety climate during crises, while leveraging positive affectivity to integrate new information to stabilize safety practices and develop effective contingency responses to immediate needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.