ArticleHealth care management review
Advancing organizational mindfulness in nursing: Bridging the theory-implementation gap.
Article in Health care management review. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccording to organizational mindfulness (OM) theory, teams must constantly anticipate and recover from unforeseen events by avoiding oversimplified explanations, being attuned to operational details, maintaining commitment to resilience, engaging in preoccupation with failure, and prioritizing expertise in problem solving. Despite its merits, the assimilation of OM theory into health care systems remains challenging, as fundamental practices and procedures within these systems often conflict with the core principles of OM, leading to an implementation gap. PURPOSE: We begin by emphasizing why health care professionals, particularly nurses, are not yet ready for and even resistant to OM. Although OM is intensely patient focused and enables nurses to practice in alignment with the ideals of nursing, they may be reluctant to embrace it due to the burden it places on them without adequate resources. METHODOLOGY: We argue that readiness for change (RFC) theory offers valuable insights into addressing this challenge by identifying and mitigating barriers to change. We combine research on OM with the RFC model to conceptualize how to systematically integrate OM into health care settings.
findingsConceptually integrating RFC and OM frameworks can aid in narrowing the OM theory-implementation gap. To advance the field further, OM scholars should focus on better operationalizing OM principles, designing interventions to implement OM, and assessing their effectiveness with longitudinal designs and identify contextual boundary conditions for OM effective implementation. Moreover, we describe how leaders can support OM and RFC while managing resource constraints and supporting overwhelmed health care workers. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We distill our analysis into the 6-Step Road Map, suggesting evidence-based strategies for health care policymakers, administrators, and managers aiming to implement OM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.