ArticleArtificial organs2025
Regenerative Response 35 Days After Esophageal Replacement in a Porcine Model; Technical Difficulties and Attempts to Achieve Optimal Tissue Remodeling.
Article in Artificial organs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn previous articles, a porcine model for bridging circumferential defects in the intrathoracic esophagus was developed. The aims of this present study were to evaluate the continued healing response after 35 days, avoid stent migration of the esophageal stent, and to investigate whether it would be beneficial to add new extracellular matrix (ECM) to the healing area after 20 days.
methodsSurgery was performed in twelve piglets, and five different types of stents were used. In two piglets, new ECM was added by endoscope to the area of healing after 20 days. After the animals were euthanized, the esophageal tissue was examined.
resultsHistologic examination after 35 days showed clusters of desmin-positive smooth muscle cells and the sprouting of nerves in the area that was healing. Generally, there were fewer M1 classically activated macrophages in specimens after 35 days when we compared them with the 20-day study. The CD 163 positive macrophages (M2-macrophages) were seen in all specimens. Four piglets did not survive to the end of the study period because of adverse events. Out of the eight piglets that were euthanized after 34 to 35 days, six had stents that had migrated to the stomach. Only in two piglets, who had large rilled stents, did the stents remain in place throughout the study period.
conclusionAfter 35 days, the area of healing did not show more signs of regenerative healing than the 20 days study. A procedure to add a new biomatrix by re-stenting endoscopically after 20 days was performed on two pigs. The procedure was feasible, but due to limb pain in the animals, they had to be euthanized prior to the plan, which prevented the evaluation of the effect on the regenerative response. The regenerative healing that was started needs to be further orchestrated in other ways to produce a more functional outcome with time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.