ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2025
Effectiveness of the Ilizarov method in treating complex nonunions of the lower limb long bones.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The dynamic changes of postoperative symptoms in lower limb Ilizarov bone transport patients: a longitudinal cross-lagged panel network analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Foundations for the Successful Establishment of a Multidisciplinary Orthoplastic Surgery Team.Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V... · 2026Review
- Septic nonunion of the distal tibia in a sickle cell disease patient: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Ilizarov Method for the Management of Infected Nonunion of the Femur With or Without Bony Defects.Cureus · 2026Article
- Failure Modes in Ilizarov Limb Salvage: A Narrative Review of Technical, Biological, Patient-related and Systemic Determinants.Strategies in trauma and limb reconstructionArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundComplex nonunions of the lower limb long bones represent a challenging issue in orthopedics. Although the Ilizarov method is considered a successful treatment modality, its success varies with complications and patient-related factors.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the radiological and functional outcomes of the Ilizarov method in the management of complex nonunions of long bones. Specifically, we assessed bone healing, functional restoration, complication rates, and effectiveness of staged management strategies, including infection control and limb reconstruction.MethodsThis retrospective/prospective case series included 30 patients (31 nonunion cases) treated at three tertiary centers in Erbil city between 2020 and 2024. The patients underwent Ilizarov frame application following debridement and staged management for infection and bone transport. Outcomes were assessed using the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov criteria.ResultsThe union rate of the study cohort was 90.3%, with a mean treatment duration of 9.26 months. Functional outcomes were rated as excellent, good, and poor in 67.7%, 22.6%, and 6.5% of the cases, respectively. Common problems included pin tract infections (35.5%), limb length discrepancy (32.3%), and malalignment (9.7%).ConclusionAlthough the Ilizarov method yielded high union rates and satisfactory functional outcomes in complex nonunions, limb length discrepancies and pin tract infections remain critical issues. Optimizing rehabilitation, compliance, and surgical planning is crucial for improving long-term functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.