Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40357862›Full record

ArticleThe clinical respiratory journal2025

Pressure Properties of a New Positive Expiratory Pressure Device-OpenUp Flow a Three-in-One Solution.

Pär Wennberg, Bengt Sundberg, Elisabeth Westerdahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The clinical respiratory journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pär WennbergSchool of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7690-1735
Bengt SundbergSchool of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Elisabeth WesterdahlFaculty of Medicine and Health, University Health Care Research Center, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8363-1662

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA new flow-regulated PEP device has been evaluated regarding functionality and pressure properties.

methodsThe three different resistance levels were assessed and evaluated at standardized flow rates of 10 and 18 L/min; Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyse the differences in generated pressure between the different resistance levels.

resultsA range of 3-31 cmH

conclusionOverall, there was a significant difference in pressure among different resistance levels at both flow rates, showing that the high resistance significantly increased pressure compared with low resistance. This new device is performing comparable with other resistors available in the market.

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationAirway ResistanceEquipment DesignHumansPressurebreathing exerciseschronic obstructivepulmonary diseaserespiratory therapy

Identifiers

PMID40357862
PMCPMC12070251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.