ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2025
Parental Communication With their Children about Cancer Risk and DTC Cascade Genetic Testing: Implications for Genetic Education and Counseling.
Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In Search of Genetic Agency: On the Uses and Actionability of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Test Results in Biohacking Practices.Sociology of health & illness · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cascade genetic testing for cancer risk can influence relatives' health outcomes, as they may benefit from risk reduction and screening. However, clinical guidelines discourage predictive genetic testing in childhood-including direct-to-consumer (DTC) testing. This study examined high-risk parents' preparation of their children (primarily adolescents and young adults) for cascade genetic testing for adult-onset inherited cancers. Surveys were completed by N = 126 parents with pathogenic variants predisposing to adult-onset inherited cancers included on DTC testing panels. A total of 81% of children were aware of their parents' hereditary cancer predisposition and 62% of parents had discussed their children's participation in cancer genetic testing. Potential risks of DTC testing identified by parents included lack of engagement with clinicians; potential benefits were its usefulness for child/family health and convenience. Parents with older children (B = 0.07, p = < 0.001), greater confidence in using genetic information (B = 0.02, p < 0.05), and who held more favorable opinions about pediatric genetic testing (B = 0.02, p < 0.01) were more likely to make their children aware of their familial cancer risk and discuss cascade testing. Most high-risk parents discuss hereditary cancer and testing options with their older children. Research is needed to enrich understanding of healthcare professionals' roles in navigating the implications of cascade genetic testing choices within the family, including DTC testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.