ArticleBJPsych open2025
A national survey of current discharge planning and aftercare arrangement practices for those returned to prison from secure psychiatric services in England and Wales.
Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mental healthcare practices from entry to release across Southeastern jails.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about the transition process for those returned to prison following treatment in secure psychiatric services. This study is the first internationally to explore the process of discharge/aftercare planning for this population.
aimTo identify the current national discharge and aftercare planning procedures for people returned to prison in England and Wales.
methodsA national survey of current service discharge planning and aftercare arrangement practices in low- and medium-secure psychiatric services and prison mental health teams in England and Wales.
resultsWe had a 72% response rate across prison-based and secure mental health services. A summative contents analysis highlighted that outstanding priority areas for improvement, include (a) relationship building to improve communication and understanding between secure psychiatric services, prison mental health services, and the prison estate and (b) significant reform and additional resources to achieve the expected standard of care and to provide people returned to prison with a care package tailored to meet their specific needs.
conclusionEffective care planning and management of return to prison from secure psychiatric services has the potential to improve patient health and well-being in prison and up to and beyond their subsequent prison release, with far-reaching effects on prevention of relapse, hospital readmission, reoffending and other adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.