ReviewExpert opinion on drug delivery2025
Recent advances in nanocrystals for arthritis drug delivery.
Review in Expert opinion on drug delivery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vivo spatiotemporal fate of nanoparticle-incorporated dissolving microneedles: nanoparticle size effects.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- Polymer Microneedles for Localized Drug Delivery in Musculoskeletal Tissue Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Hydrogels as Local Structural-Protective Platforms in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Evidence-Graded Review Across the Synovium-Cartilage-Bone Axis.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Protein-based nanocarrier delivering kartogenin derivative to cartilage matrix for intra-articular treatment of osteoarthritis.Journal of drug delivery science and technology · 2026Article
- Article
- How Selective are Nanomaterials to Treat Osteoarthritis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Sustained-Release Intra-Articular Drug Delivery: PLGA Systems in Clinical Context and Evolving Strategies.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMore than 500 million people worldwide suffer from arthritis, experiencing daily pain and inflammation. Current treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are palliative, offering only symptom relief. No disease-modifying OA drugs (DMOADs) capable of restoring joint functionality and regenerating the cartilage matrix have yet been approved by the FDA or EMA. AREAS COVERED: This review highlights recent advances in nanocrystals (NCs) for arthritis drug delivery, including conventional nanosuspensions and novel transdermal microneedles. Special attention is given to intra-articular DMOADs formulated as NC-in-microparticles, designed to extend drug release over months. Papers and reviews with the mentioned contents and published over the last 5 years were included in the review process. EXPERT OPINION: New DMOADs and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are often poorly water-soluble, limiting their clinical progress. The versatility of NCs and nanosuspensions offers a potential advantage over other types of nanoparticles, as they can be adapted to various delivery systems, administration routes, and types of arthritis. Due to the avascular nature of cartilage, exploring the intra-articular route for OA management is essential. Implementing cartilage-targeted strategies or using stimuli-responsive hydrogels can further enhance their therapeutic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.