Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40357514›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Assessing communicative-pragmatic ability in telehealth: e-ABaCo in autistic individuals.

Ilaria Traetta, Ilaria Gabbatore, Alessandra Aimar, Giuseppe Maurizio Arduino, Francesca M Bosco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ilaria TraettaDepartment of Psychology, Research Group on Inferential Processes in Social Interaction (GIPSI) Research Group, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Ilaria GabbatoreDepartment of Humanities, Research Group on Inferential Processes in Social Interaction (GIPSI) Research Group, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Alessandra AimarCentro Riabilitazione Ferrero, Alba, Italy.
Giuseppe Maurizio ArduinoCentro Autismo e Sindrome di Asperger ASL CN1, Mondovì, Italy.
Francesca M BoscoDepartment of Psychology, Research Group on Inferential Processes in Social Interaction (GIPSI) Research Group, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by difficulties in social communication. Autistic individuals who are verbally fluent, often show difficulties in pragmatic ability, i.e. the capacity to use language and other expressive means, as gestures or the tone of the voice, to convey meaning in a given context. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of various technologies such as videoconferencing and internet for the delivery of healthcare services, i.e. telehealth, has proven to be effective, accessible and safe tools for remote healthcare. However, there are few tools to assess pragmatic skills in telehealth. This study investigates the effectiveness of the telehealth-adapted Assessment Battery for Communication (e-ABaCo), a clinical tool previously validated for in-person assessments, to evaluate pragmatic abilities in autistic individuals. We expect a substantial equivalence in performance for the administration of the adapted version of e-ABaCo compared to the face-to-face one. Methods: We compared the performance of 30 autistic adolescents, of which 15 assessed via telehealth (ASD TH) and 15 assessed face-to-face (ASD FtF), with that of 15 adolescents with typical development (face-to-face assessment). The groups were matched for age, sex, and intellectual quotient. E-ABaCo was used to assess both comprehension and production of communicative ability realized through different expressive means, i.e. linguistic, extralinguistic and paralinguistic, as well as social appropriateness. Results: In line with the expectation, the pragmatic performance of autistic adolescents showed a substantial equivalence when comparing the assessments conducted via telehealth and face-to-face modality. Moreover, in line with the relevant literature, there was a significant difference between the ASD groups' performance (both FtF and TH) and the control group of the adolescents with typical development (CG FtF) in all pragmatic aspects assessed, i.e. the Pragmatic total score, comprehension and production abilities, and all the expressive means investigated. Discussion: These results confirm the potential usefulness of telehealth assessment procedures, and demonstrate the sensitivity and validity of e-ABaCo for conducting an effective assessment of pragmatic skills in on-line modality in autistic adolescents.

Indexed as

adolescentsautism spectrum disordersautistic peoplepragmaticsremote assessmenttele-assessmenttele-evaluationtelehealth

Identifiers

PMID40357514
PMCPMC12066485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.