ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
An integrated neurophenomenological framework for naturalistic assessment of work-related stressors in healthcare professionals: a pilot study in neuro-surgery.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fostering Psychophysical Well-Being via Remote Self-Managed Empowerment Protocols: A Scoping Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Work-related stress and burnout are pervasive challenges in healthcare, particularly in high-stakes specialties like neurosurgery. Neurosurgeons face unique demands, including prolonged cognitive and physical strain, emotionally charged patient interactions, and ethical dilemmas. These stressors significantly impact individual wellbeing, patient safety, and organizational efficiency. However, traditional stress assessment methods, such as self-reports and retrospective surveys, fail to capture the dynamic and context-specific nature of stress in real-world clinical environments. This paper introduces an integrated neurophenomenological framework for assessing stress in neurosurgeons, combining continuous physiological monitoring with real-time phenomenological assessments using experience sampling methods (ESM). Wearable devices enable the collection of granular physiological data-heart rate, heart rate variability, electrodermal activity, and skin temperature-while ESM provides real-time subjective insights, reducing recall biases. Synchronizing these data streams offers a holistic understanding of stress dynamics. A pilot study is introduced to discuss the feasibility of this approach. Participants engaged in ward-based and surgical tasks while their physiological data were continuously recorded. Structured interviews and psychometric tools complemented these measures, revealing context-specific stress responses: higher electrodermal activity during emotionally demanding ward shifts and elevated heart rate during physically intense surgical procedures. Discrepancies between physiological activation and subjective stress perception highlighted the importance of interoceptive awareness in modulating stress responses. This framework offers a replicable model for advancing stress research in healthcare. By integrating physiological and phenomenological data, it provides actionable insights into stress dynamics, paving the way for targeted interventions to enhance resilience and optimize patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.