Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40357483›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Validating attribute hierarchies in cognitive diagnosis models.

Xueqin Zhang, Yu Jiang, Tao Xin, Yanlou Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xueqin ZhangCollaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yu JiangJoint Logistics College, National Defense University, Beijing, China.
Tao XinCollaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yanlou LiuChina Academy of Education Big Data, Qufu Normal University, Qufu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) are restricted latent class models that are widely used in educational and psychological fields. Attribute hierarchy, as an important structural feature of the CDM, can provide critical information for inferring examinees' attribute mastery patterns. Previous studies usually formulate likelihood ratio (LR) tests for full models and hierarchical models to validate attribute hierarchies, but their asymptotic distributions tend to become non-standard, resulting in test failures. This study proposes the Wald statistic to statistically test the

Indexed as

attribute hierarchycognitive diagnosis modelcovariance matrixinformation matrixlikelihood ratio test

Identifiers

PMID40357483
PMCPMC12067792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.