ArticleOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2025
Using an in-situ Simulation Model to Identify Deviations from Guideline-Based Management of Pediatric Status Epilepticus in Community Emergency Departments.
Article in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children with epilepsy are often presented to Community Emergency Departments (CEDs) for acute treatment of status epilepticus (SE). Timely medical management is imperative to prevent morbidity and mortality, and adherence to evidence-based guidelines improves outcomes for high stakes/low frequency events. Barriers to guideline adherent management in the CED setting are understudied; in-situ simulation (ISS) can be used to identify gaps in care for events such as pediatric SE. Objective: The primary objective was to assess for deviations from evidence-based guidelines in the management of pediatric SE. A secondary objective was to explore potential barriers to practice within the evidence-based guidelines. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational ISS pilot study examining representative CED teams caring for a simulated child in SE. The primary outcome was overall adherence to the pediatric SE guidelines as measured by 12 metrics: 5 non-pharmacologic (for example: delays in vital sign assessment, failure to time seizure) and 7 pharmacologic (for example: incorrect benzodiazepine dose, delay in benzodiazepine administration or escalation to antiseizure medication). Additional metrics including provider knowledge (recognition of status epilepticus) and resources (antiseizure medications stocked) were analyzed as process measures. We enrolled 4 interprofessional teams at 4 participating ED sites. Results: Overall, 0 of the 4 teams adhered to all 12 metrics. A barrier to timely administration of benzodiazepines for two of the sites came from attempting IV access repeatedly. No team referenced an up-to-date treatment algorithm based on current evidence-based guidelines. Conclusion: Standardized ISS scenarios identified variability in adherence to the pediatric SE guideline across a pilot sample of local CEDs. Barriers to guideline-adherent care occurred at both individual and systems levels. The study was limited in scope to 4 pilot sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.