ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Efficacy and safety of off-label direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin for left ventricular thrombus: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for left ventricular thrombus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Eosinophilic Myocarditis Treated with IL-5 Blockade: An Integrated Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Case report: inadvertent misplacement of pacemaker leads in the left ventricle and left circumflex artery.European heart journal. Case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of using off-label direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to warfarin for treating left ventricular (LV) thrombi using inverse probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. Methods: An observational study of 302 eligible patients with newly diagnosed LV thrombi was conducted at a tertiary referral center from January 2020 to December 2023. Of the 302 patients, 183 received treatment with DOACs, while 119 were treated with warfarin. The primary endpoint was defined as the complete resolution of the thrombus within one month. The secondary endpoints were defined as the complete resolution of the thrombus within six months along with the following events, including minor and major bleeding events, a systemic embolism, transient ischemic attack, stroke, and all-cause mortality. Alongside individual endpoints, a composite endpoint involving ischemic stroke or mortality was also examined. Results: IPTW estimates suggested that DOACs were significantly more effective than warfarin in resolving LV thrombus within one month (RR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.14-1.66; Conclusions: DOACs, specifically rivaroxaban, could be a promising therapeutic alternative for treating LV thrombi. Further research through randomized clinical trials is necessary to confirm our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.