ArticleDigital health
Digital innovation in ophthalmic admissions: Impact on hospital quality in China.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to construct and evaluate a digital admission management platform for ophthalmology in China, assessing its impact on nurse reception time, patient satisfaction, human cost and healthcare staff experience, with the goal of enhancing the efficiency and quality of ophthalmic medical services. Methods: A multidisciplinary team conducted a digital transformation, involving needs assessment, process analysis, and design of a digital admission preparation center system tailored for ophthalmic hospitals. We collected data on nursing times for processing admissions and receiving new patients, patient satisfaction ratings, and healthcare staff feedback before and after the implementation of the digital system to evaluate its impact on operational efficiency. Results: The implementation of the digital system led to a significant reduction in nursing times for processing admissions (from 733.05 ± 188.34 seconds to 547.18 ± 86.97 seconds) and receiving new patients (from 272.38 ± 73.66 seconds to 215.58 ± 20.95 seconds), with statistically significant differences ( Conclusion: The construction and application of a digital ophthalmic admission management platform significantly improved admission management efficiency, increased patient satisfaction, and optimized the working environment for healthcare staff. Digital transformation is a key strategy for enhancing the efficiency of ophthalmic medical services, reducing costs, and improving patient experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.