Observational studyFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Clinical evaluation of personalized
Observational study in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Third-Line and Later Susceptibility-GuidedJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative effectiveness of genotype-guided and empirical bismuth-containing quadruple therapy forFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Growing antibiotic resistance in Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted across 13 hospitals within Jiangsu Province. Fecal samples were analyzed using fluorescence PCR for the Results: A total of 387 participants completed the eradication treatment, with an overall success rate of 91.0% (352/387, 95% CI: 87.6%-93.6%). Among them, 310 individuals received a 14-day course of bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT), achieving an eradication rate of 90.0% (279/310, 95% CI: 86.1%-93.1%). 77 participants were treated with high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) for the same duration, resulting in a slightly higher eradication rate of 94.8% (73/77, 95% CI: 87.2%-98.6%), although this difference was not statistically significant ( Conclusion: PCR detection from fecal samples targeting the resistance genes of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.